Go to content, skip over navigation


More Pages

Go to content, skip over visible header bar
Home News Features Arts & Entertainment Sports OpinionAbout Contact Advertise

Note about Unsupported Devices:

You seem to be browsing on a screen size, browser, or device that this website cannot support. Some things might look and act a little weird.

Letter to the Editor: Bowdoin’s treasurer responds to housekeepers

October 7, 2019

This piece represents the opinion of the author .

To the editor:

An opinion piece by 12 of Bowdoin’s 54 housekeepers and the lead editorial in the October 4 edition of The Bowdoin Orient remind us that housekeepers do critical and challenging work at the College. But much of what is asserted in the paper is inaccurate or drawn from experiences that occurred years ago. Additionally, both pieces ignore the substantial work that has been done or that is currently underway to ensure that Bowdoin housekeepers are appreciated, properly compensated, and provided with a work environment that is open, fair and safe.

It is important to acknowledge at the outset that cleaning our facilities, restoring spaces after events and picking up after other people is often tough and unpleasant work—here or anywhere. Our colleagues who do this work day in and day out deserve our respect, and we all need to do what we can to reduce their burden and to demonstrate our appreciation for their amazing work.

Saying thank you is important, but we also encourage employees to come forward when there are problems on the job, and we provide a variety of mechanisms for doing so. We want to know when working conditions need to be addressed, and absolutely no one is disciplined for speaking up. During the past two years, we have been listening carefully to the concerns and suggestions of our housekeeping staff and we continue to take concrete steps in response.

We have replied previously to inaccurate, misleading and exaggerated information published in the Orient and elsewhere about Bowdoin’s housekeepers. The facts are posted on the Bowdoin website. But some of the new claims published Friday—and the editorial by the Orient staff—require an additional response. These new claims deal specifically with issues of safety, training, workload and work schedules, distance to work sites and engagement with supervisors and with the College.


There is nothing more important at Bowdoin than safety. The process for new housekeepers has been restructured and requires extensive orientation within their first two days of employment. Required training includes more than three hours on dealing with blood-borne pathogens and other hazardous materials and chemical safety, as well as a full overview with a member of the Environmental Health and Safety staff. The training also instructs housekeepers on the protocol for reporting accidents and injuries. Immediately following the two-day orientation, new housekeepers perform two weeks of job shadowing and receive on-the-job training in the buildings where they are assigned.

In addition to training and orientation for new housekeepers, all housekeeping employees are trained annually—both online and in a classroom setting—to deal with blood-borne pathogens, and they receive periodic training from experts in workplace safety (one such session took place Wednesday, October 16).

We know that housekeeping jobs are physically demanding and that repetitive motion injuries are common in the industry. At Bowdoin, our safety scores significantly outperform industry averages each year because of the attention paid to proper cleaning techniques. Lightweight microfiber mops, electric shower scrubbers and other ergonomic equipment were added to housekeeper toolkits, and we know from many housekeepers the difference these changes have made in their work.

If there is ever an issue with air quality, the College immediately hires consultants to conduct tests and to mitigate any problem. When occasional reports of lice surface in the Children’s Center (a common problem brought into schools and daycare facilities), housekeepers are notified of the nature of the work-order before entering the facility and basic protocols are followed to perform the cleanup.

Workload and Work Schedules

No employee at the College is expected or required to complete more work assignments than can typically be conducted in a regular work day, and overtime is infrequently requested and rarely mandatory. Protocols are in place to reduce building cleaning services when staffing levels are low. There were no vacancies in housekeeping from November 2018 to May 2019. Since May, there have been a total of three vacancies on the housekeeping staff: one retirement, one promotion to another department in August and one resignation in May. In what is a very tight labor market in Maine, two of these vacancies have since been filled. With regard to the work schedule, many housekeepers have told us that they prefer an early morning start, and that changing to a later schedule would not be welcome.

Two years ago, the College’s events and set-ups crew was restructured and supplemented with additional staff. This crew—like our housekeepers—does amazing work. The result has been a dramatic reduction in requests for lightweight setup assistance from housekeepers over the last two years. And housekeepers are no longer called upon to move heavy furniture like they had been in the past.

Distance to Work Sites

Those familiar with the Bowdoin campus know that, with the exception of the Schiller Coastal Studies Center and the Bowdoin Scientific Station on Kent Island—both of which have dedicated staff—all of our facilities are on or close to campus. Some housekeepers choose to drive rather than to walk to Stowe Inn and to Mayflower and Pine Street apartments, but everything needed for their jobs is stored at those sites. When heavy equipment is required, it is transported using a College van. During a ten-day mandatory overtime period in late May when Commencement and other campus events require additional staffing, supplies and minor equipment are often moved between buildings as necessary to complete the work in a compressed timeframe. Each housekeeper has access to a pull cart purchased over the last couple of years to transport the supplies, but some still choose to drive.

Engagement with Supervisors and with the College

There has been a great deal done in recent months to improve the lines of communication between housekeepers, their supervisors, and others at the College. This past summer, I asked Mary Lou Kennedy—who has led Bowdoin’s highly regarded dining service for over 30 years—to spend the next year as an internal management consultant for the housekeeping department, reporting directly to me. Mary Lou just completed individual meetings with each of our housekeepers to hear directly from them about work assignments and conditions, their work relationships with other housekeepers, and their successes and challenges. Mary Lou will use the information she has gathered to recommend additional improvements.


These are just some examples of what we are doing at the College to continually improve the workplace. We’ve made a lot of progress, and we will continue to listen and move forward with the best interests of our housekeepers and all employees in mind. It is also incumbent on each of us to pay attention to our own habits that add to the burdens of our housekeepers.

We will continue to encourage all employees to speak up when there are problems, when they have concerns, and when they have suggestions for improving workplace conditions at the College.

Housekeeping can be challenging and unpleasant work, and our colleagues who do this work, like every employee at Bowdoin, deserve leading wages and benefits, a safe and respectful working environment and our appreciation. Our commitment is to work every day to provide these things.


Matt Orlando

Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration & Treasurer



Before submitting a comment, please review our comment policy. Some key points from the policy:

  • No hate speech, profanity, disrespectful or threatening comments.
  • No personal attacks on reporters.
  • Comments must be under 200 words.
  • You are strongly encouraged to use a real name or identifier ("Class of '92").
  • Any comments made with an email address that does not belong to you will get removed.


  1. Ben Ray '20 says:

    “Matt Orlando responds to housekeepers” ?? Matt Orlando drafts up a quick list of Bowdoin policies and ignores the words of everyone on staff who is fed up, mistreated, overworked and underpaid. This is the kind of attitude that pushes people into speaking up in the first place!! For once would these arrogant administrators just LISTEN? Seriously. Just try acknowledging the experiences of others for once. Why is our treasurer responding to staff? Why has this been happening for years now, public since the spring of 2018, with NOTHING DONE? And no apology? Not even a hint of remorse that Bowdoin employees are hurting. Oof.

    • Class of 22 says:

      No acknowledgement of these wonderful workers’ emotional truths while adhering to the notion that the school has done no wrong “on paper.” Orlando even goes to imply that these workers simply aren’t using the established channels of communication right—hey, maybe there’s a reason why going public was the only option, just think about it.

    • Class of 22 says:

      No acknowledgement of these wonderful workers’ emotional truths while adhering to the notion that the school has done no wrong “on paper.” Orlando even goes to imply that these workers simply aren’t using the established channels of communication right—hey, maybe there’s a reason why going public was the only option.

  2. Beth says:

    This response was beyond hurtful to read. I hope your surprise meeting today clarified some things for you but the damage is done. There are so many inaccuracies in your statement and it would be a good show of faith to correct it and if you are upset about the lack of information getting to you then your fight is not with us but with anybody who is stopping this information from you. We have been repeatedly vocal for years and somehow you know nothing. Unfortunately what was said in that meeting isn’t even the half of it so before you tell us we’re wrong or exaggerate maybe talk with us first or better yet just believe us.

  3. Class of '17 says:

    This is a disgusting response.

    Pay every housekeeper a good wage. You could triple their pay and it would barely change the budget.

    Bowdoin is not getting a single cent from me until they treat every employee well. I encourage all alumni who feel similarly to donate to the Bowdoin Labor Alliance housekeeper’s fund.

  4. Ben Sickle says:

    I can’t get over the comparison to the “industry standard.” C’mon! We are better than this! They’re running a business here, but this is not a business issue. This is a community issue. If the existential goal of the board and the administration is to perpetuate and act in the best immediate interest of the institution, they are failing. Not adequately listening and resolving this issue pains me and leaves me dissatisfied to associate. I worry this continual fumble on the part of the administration will change how current students and newly-minted alumni will engage with the College going forward. If the treasurer and the administration as a whole want this community to evaluated as merely adequate, and not as exceptional as we shout at the top of our lungs raising songs at Pre-O’s and (admittedly teary-eyed at) graduation, then they should keep doing what they’re doing: resting on laurels. Or, as they encourage us to do, they could start “[gaining] a standard for the appreciation of others’ work and the criticism of [their] own,” rather than dismissing community members (especially students) lost in generous enthusiasms, cooperating with others for common ends.

  5. Class of '23 says:

    This response is pathetic. How about instead of denying all the evidence over and over, you actually LISTEN to the workers who have been mistreated, and work with them? This letter makes no reference to the specific complaints brought up by the housekeeping staff, and the fact that this can even be considered a ‘response’ is laughable. Someone needs to hold this administration accountable, because they’re apparently incapable of doing it themselves.


  6. Sandy Green says:

    Matt I am VERY happy you met with housekeeping after publishing this letter. We could tell you had no idea what we say is the truth. Now you know I look forward to see progress in our department. I do know you care so untie your hands and let’s get our department into a good place once again. As you can tell we have the positive support.

  7. James Pierce, Bowdoin 1969 says:

    Matt Orlando has mastered the arts of gaslighting and stonewalling quite well. He and the rest of the hierarchy should forego all their perks and live on what he and his minions pay the housekeeping staff for six months and find out what life outside the ivory tower is really like.

    If the town of Brunswick can afford to pay its school custodians a decent wage the well-heeled Bowdoin should be able to do so as well.

  8. H. Peirre Atestes. says:


    No one is forcing you to work at the holier then thou Bowdoin College. Don’t like your working environment? Make a move.

    By reading all of these replies it reaffirms the ideology I have suspected this institution is teaching these young minds. God (did I really write that) helps us all.

  9. Sandy Green says:

    I’m sorry but I don’t feel I have to quit my job and walk away. I love my job. The community and being a part of Bowdoin. Why would I do that? I’m going to fight for what I feel is right.

Leave a Reply

Any comments that do not follow the policy will not be published.

0/200 words