Go to content, skip over navigation


More Pages

Go to content, skip over visible header bar
Home News Features Arts & Entertainment Sports OpinionAbout Contact Advertise

Note about Unsupported Devices:

You seem to be browsing on a screen size, browser, or device that this website cannot support. Some things might look and act a little weird.

Construction begins on new Frank J. Wood Bridge

September 8, 2023

Alex Spear
IN WITH THE NEW: The first pylons of the replacement bridge for the Frank J. Wood Bridge are lowered into the Androscoggin River. The start of construction signals a close to the long-fought battle over the historical significance of the bridge and rehabilitation efforts.

Trussed above the Androscoggin River running between Brunswick and Topsham, a fight over history has finally been settled. The replacement Frank J. Wood Bridge (FJWB) is officially under construction yards from the original. Construction broke ground in July.

The FJWB will stand at least a few more years, with construction on the new bridge not expected to be done until 2025 and the demolition of the original planned for October 2025. Additionally, traffic changes won’t occur until early 2025, when they are expected to force a reroute along Route 196, east of the current bridge.

“The existing bridge is more than 90 years old. It is fracture critical and rated in poor condition. Since November 2021, [the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT)] has prohibited all commercial traffic from using the current bridge. While bridges are normally inspected every two years, the Frank J. Wood Bridge is inspected every six months to allow for more frequent analysis of its condition and the potential need for further traffic or weight restrictions,” MaineDOT said in a statement on July 26.

Breaking ground on this project has involved an over-eight-year legal battle between local activists fighting to save the bridge and MaineDOT. Despite the official announcement of the project, anti-construction activist group Friends of FJWB have not backed down.

In 2016, when the initial concerns about the bridge’s “fracture level critical” status came to light and the possibility of a new bridge was proposed, Friends of FJWB formed a concerted effort to fight the change. Considering the FJWB’s eligibility for listing in the National Registry of Historic Places, the land is protected under federal law in the circumstance that there is a “feasible and prudent” alternative to the proposed reconstruction project.

Friends of FJWB argued that replacing the bridge altogether was significantly more expensive than merely refurbishing it, citing the federal law as grounds to protect the historic bridge. The group began with grassroots protest and eventually took their case to court. However, the Federal Highway Association (FHA) found that replacing the bridge would be less expensive than refurbishing it, ultimately ending the case.

Shortly after approval from the FHA, MaineDOT announced construction plans for the bridge estimated at over $42 million, and the Friends of FJWB grew more enraged.

“In the figures presented to FHWA by [MaineDOT] to make the case for new construction, they claimed the new bridge would cost $13 million when their own recent three year plan shows the cost to be at over $42 million. This difference cannot solely be attributed to inflation,” Friends of FJWB stated in a release from February 24.

In the same statement, the Friends of FJWB vowed to continue its legal fight against MaineDOT. Despite filing a suit in April challenging the department’s new estimate, the group did not succeed in its effort to stop construction or contract bidding.

MaineDOT signed a contract with local construction company Reed & Reed in March for over $43 million and construction began in late July. Though replacing the bridge is on the horizon, the green and brown trussed wonder will stand in all its glory for at least another few years.


Before submitting a comment, please review our comment policy. Some key points from the policy:

  • No hate speech, profanity, disrespectful or threatening comments.
  • No personal attacks on reporters.
  • Comments must be under 200 words.
  • You are strongly encouraged to use a real name or identifier ("Class of '92").
  • Any comments made with an email address that does not belong to you will get removed.


  1. Doug Bennett says:

    This controversy hasn’t just been “local activists” vs MDOT. Many more residents and both local governments have supported building a new bridge.

  2. Steve Lindsey says:

    I think its a shame a few of these iron and steel bridges aren’t set aside in Maine as part of our nation’s civil engineering heritage.Like we do the lighthouses on the coast. This bridge would have made a splendid public space and non-motorized traffic near its new Brutalist school replacement. But when you win like MaineDOT, consideration of the vanquished parties and grassroots citizens is out of the question.

  3. Mr. Noah Saperstein says:

    Good! I think it is ridiculous that so many people would prefer dumping lots of money into restoring an old (unsafe) bridge when replacing it is a much cheaper alternative.

Leave a Reply

Any comments that do not follow the policy will not be published.

0/200 words