Go to content, skip over navigation


More Pages

Go to content, skip over visible header bar
Home News Features Arts & Entertainment Sports OpinionAbout Contact Advertise

Note about Unsupported Devices:

You seem to be browsing on a screen size, browser, or device that this website cannot support. Some things might look and act a little weird.

Racism is alive and well here

October 19, 2018

This piece represents the opinion of the author .
Molly Kennedy

Social change is often discussed in two ways, with the bottom-up and top-down approach. Think of them as the People versus the President. Who is responsible for change? Bottom-up says the People, top-down the President. But I say they are both responsible. The two are not mutually exclusive—in fact, change only occurs when the two are working together.

At Bowdoin, I fear we have adopted the bottom-up approach, and administrators place the burden of building an inclusive community almost entirely on students. Think of last year, when the Disabled Students Association had to demand that the College comply with the Americans with Disability Act (which is a federal law). In moments like these, administrators should be leading the charge, not waiting for students to mobilize the whole campus.

In smaller moments, we see this same behavior. Last February, Dean Tim Foster sent an email to all students asking us to consider living with new people in the coming year. “Mix things up a bit,” he wrote, “[live] with a new group of people who are different from you.” While I share the sentiment—of course, we should begin to engage across difference—I disagree with the plan of action prescribed by our dean of student affairs.

By his own admission, this stance came from students: “As a group of upperclass student leaders said to me,” Foster wrote, “students need to prioritize continually meeting new people. I wholeheartedly agree.” Why do student leaders need to explain this to him? Meeting new people, especially those with different backgrounds and perspectives, is a basic tenet of any college experience. Our administrators should know this.

They should also know the extent to which the student body continues to be divided. For Dean Foster, “living in a College House with people you might not already know” is a successful way of “mixing things up,” but the College Houses are some of the whitest institutions on this campus. If I were to walk into almost any one of them, I would be the only black person there. The exception is Howell, but is that enough? Is this what we want to call an inclusive campus community?

Rather than working towards inclusivity, substance-free housing like Howell only reinforces segregation. It creates little pockets for people of color to live with a monotony of minorities amid a predominantly white institution. They are safe spaces, but they are also sheltered spaces, because students fail to gain the skills and experiences that come from living and socializing with people different from themselves. About five years ago, substance-free first years were compiled into a single dorm, colloquially known as the “Black dorm.” This substance-free housing policy is college-sanctioned segregation. It was unacceptable then, and it is unacceptable now.

Racism is a structural force—it is not a personal problem. As such, students alone do not have the tools to dismantle it. For example, no matter what I do in the African-American Society, our black men will still struggle to graduate on time, and we will never be accepted into mainstream culture. We need a structural overhaul in order to change these things.

This is what I find so frustrating about Dean Foster’s email: he denies a structural solution and instead tasks students with fixing systemic problems. I am tired of emails. If you want students to “mix it up,” redesign substance-free housing, tinker with Residential Life training, reconfigure the role athletics play in our college.

The simple truth is that campus culture is determined by administrative policy. For example, when Bowdoin instituted a no-loan policy, more students of color were afforded the opportunity to come here. Could you imagine, however, if we reinstated this barrier? If we no longer accepted women? If we went back to the time where black students were not admitted either? We would be exposed for what we truly are: a campus of complacency and white supremacy.

It is high time student leaders stop doing the job of administrators. I am happy to work with them, but I will not work for them, and especially not for free. Segregation may still be in practice here, but slavery, at least, is over.


More from Opinion:

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Catch up on the latest reports, stories and opinions about Bowdoin and Brunswick in your inbox. Always high-quality. Always free.


Before submitting a comment, please review our comment policy. Some key points from the policy:

  • No hate speech, profanity, disrespectful or threatening comments.
  • No personal attacks on reporters.
  • Comments must be under 200 words.
  • You are strongly encouraged to use a real name or identifier ("Class of '92").
  • Any comments made with an email address that does not belong to you will get removed.


  1. Nicole Tjin A Djie 21 says:

    Nate, administrators should do their jobs which means doing what they can in their capacity to make opportunities for as many people to come to Bowdoin and for them to thrive once they get here. However, I see several problems with the choice of words in this piece. For example, saying that administrators determine campus culture is an oversimplification. Also you casually mentioned “structural overhaul”, what would that even entail? And “college sanctioned segregation” is quite another change for what seems like an administrative decision made with an understandable lack of foresight? The administration does what they can, but if you have better solutions that by all means say them rather than criticize that which is probably more complicated than most students realize.
    If anything, it is professors and students who shape campus culture. I think the administration should foster a culture of independence and that means staying out of the lives of students within reason.
    I look forward to speaking with you about this more in person.

  2. Seamus Keenan says:

    I can’t imagine writing these articles to be fun. I know it’s called “say it how it is” but I challenge you to be a bit more optimistic and maybe find something hopeful to write about. I think you might be finding “oppressions” that are not really there. This can box a person in. To say Bowdoin is a campus of white supremacy is really far fetched. There are no structural rules or laws on Bowdoin’s campus prohibiting persons of color from doing things a white student can. All this white supremacy is “implicit.” Implied not codified! Try doing things you think you can’t do because of whatever reason and I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised by how free Bowdoin and this country is! If someone denies you a right based on the color of your skin, I’ll be the first to criticize that act….. I just haven’t seen examples of any such thing at Bowdoin. You shouldn’t rely on others, the admin or the public, to set boundaries for yourself.

Leave a Reply

Any comments that do not follow the policy will not be published.

0/200 words