There is a particular sheen of gold that falls upon the desert at sunset. It is unlike the pale northeastern light that rises and sinks upon the Maine snow over 2,000 miles away. It is unlike anything I have ever experienced prior to visiting Arizona on an Alternative Spring Break (ASB) trip. Despite this, the desert was still somewhat familiar to me. It is the same landscape of Manifest Destiny paintings and made­-for-­TV ­movies about the Old West. It is the same desert of the postcard sky that breaks into an untouchable prism of purples, so sun­spun that representations appear flat and gaudy. Perhaps this is because the implications of the desert far surpass its visuals.

When participating in and then writing about such a trip, one inherits a set of internal politics. Traveling, gaining, then creating something out of the experience is both reflection and representation. I am not from the borderlands, so I am a tourist and a liberal arts student engaging with a place and its host of issues. Our ASB studied the migrant crisis at the Arizona/Sonora border and the economic, social and legislative systems that influence it. It was often emotional, terrifying and deeply moving at the same time. Although it would take a half­ semester of seminars and a week in the desert to even begin to describe this, some key thoughts arise as relevant to the liberal arts education, particularly regarding understanding the systematic borderlands through visual thinking.

Within this system, to be a citizen studying casualties of citizenship is a strange, paradoxical role. It is nearly as strange as the action of learning from those with less in order to better oneself or self ­knowledge. Often humanitarian groups we met that worked directly within the crisis would relay a vague, hopeful sentiment of us students eventually affecting policy or creating awareness of the issue. This was a general bid, but as a student primarily studying art and literature, I found myself challenging my engagement with the border rather distinctly: for being an arts student does not put me in a place of direct influence—I will likely never create policy—but rather in a peripheral location. Although artists have been creating work about and on the border for decades, I am a visitor and my influence exists in a liminal space. This personal conflict preserves, but not without the understanding that the border and the borderlands are too a liminal space, and thus to engage with them as a visual system is possible.
Besides the sun, the chicory air and the variable tones of russet and stucco, a distinctive trait of the desert is its effervescent, unyielding heat. It creeps higher throughout the day until it matches the temperature of the human body. To spend an hour in the sun is difficult; to spend a day trekking the border is deadly. For migrants that cross the desert, it is more than just landscape, it is death. Thousands of people have died crossing within the past two decades.

Despite border relations being a popular political issue, the fact is that the borderlands are far more. They are a home, an economy and a weapon. It is difficult to ruminate upon the beauty of a landscape when it puts human lives at stake. These are some of the paradoxes of the border, factors that make the space liminal, as if in between two worlds. Application of the arts cannot project a simple course of action and change, but then again, this is not a simple situation.
Visual thinking invokes something even more complex. People are dying at the border as a result of a system of deterrence involving a several tactics, but most famously, a wall. When our group took our enterprise van into the desert sand to visit this wall in person, we found it to be better described as a gate, or a fence. The first thing I noticed about the wall was that its rust ­colored stature soared like a piece of public large-­scale artwork, and contained nearly as much symbolic value. There is immense weight in thinking of the border line as a representation. If the 16­ million dollar per mile manifestation of the gate is purely symbolic—as it is insecure in places—then what does this mean for the fundamentals of our country and the values that are fiercely and tenaciously guarded in the borderlands?

The relationship between art and the borderlands continues to merge and morph. Liminal spaces are not unfamiliar to the arts nor is most sublime paradox of the beautiful and the terrible coexisting as one. The liberal arts, over 2,000 miles away from Maine, continue to suggest ways of thinking about the 2,000 mile stretch of border.

A body can disintegrate within three days of extreme desert conditions. The landscape, with its variations of cacti and oscillating droughts, carries a particular history that cannot be ignored. The poet Elizabeth Brewster wrote, “people are made of places / They carry with them / hints of jungles or mountains, a tropic grace / or the cool eyes of sea-gazers”. The converse of this idea is that places are made of their people. All of those bones in the desert are what make America. America, vast and golden and destined, stretches a liminal space between coasts. As tan and tantalizing as  the Arizona landscape was, nothing about it was truly foreign to me, not even the sun. We are never visitors of our own country; we are its participants, and its bounty.