The notion of “finance” at Bowdoin is a polarizing subject. Many see it as the antithesis of what a liberal arts education stands for and as a soulless construct that produces nothing, yet takes much. Others, however, exhibit great desire (perhaps quietly out of fear of derision) and ultimately intern and work within the financial realm. Consulting firms such as Deloitte and Cambridge, investment banks such as Cowen, and a host of hedge funds regularly recruit Bowdoin students. There is no question that a future in finance is an aspiration shared by many at this school. The Career Planning Center sees this interest and in turn does its best to attract relevant companies and personalities. They have even been accused of placing too much emphasis on finance.
But even with this obvious enthusiasm for the field, there is little support on the academic front. No doubt Bowdoin has a strong economics department. The absence, however, of a full-time professor who focuses on finance or accounting, basic business concepts and, frankly, Excel, is quite mysterious. The College currently does not have a tenured position or even a tenure track for an academic who wishes to become a professor of finance. For this reason, it is difficult to attract high caliber applicants like other departments. This is not an attack against potential future Bowdoin finance professors, but a reality the school faces today.
Returning to the aims of a liberal arts education, I agree that extreme specialization in a discipline such as accounting is contrary to the critical thinking Bowdoin is trying to instill in its students. We are not a business school, just as we are not an engineering, trade or “sports development” institution, nor should we try to be any of these. At some point, however, specificity in more routine, dull or “low IQ” skills, like Excel modeling, should be taught to those whose futures require it. Two weekends a year of Training the Street courses is simply insufficient.
It is no secret that finance is an incredibly competitive industry that is enormously challenging to enter. The slightest advantage or extra exposure to relevant knowledge can and does mean the difference between a résumé staying on the table or being relegated to the trash with those of the indistinguishable applicants who are “smart kids, but really struggled to walk me through a basic DCF.”
I ask the administration to consider these grievances when constructing the curriculum in the future. It can only improve Bowdoin’s academic prowess and further strengthen its young, job-seeking alumni.