On Wednesday, the artist and activist Atena Farghadani was released from prison in Iran. She was incarcerated about a year ago for creating a political cartoon advocating for reproductive rights and against members of the government. It was her second release. After her first one, the 29-year-old Farghadani made an online video that detailed her experience in prison—including solitary confinement and brutal violence—which landed her in jail once more. In addition to these two convictions, Farghadani has also been charged with threatening national security, insulting the Iranian government and even partaking in “indecent contact” upon shaking her lawyer’s hand after trial. Although international art unions and activist groups alike have stood behind Farghadani through the duration of her ordeal, she plans to remain in Iran. Despite past persecution, Iran is her home. Her attorney, in a statement, wrote that Farghadani’s lifelong dedication to art and activism comes at a “great price;” yet, a vital one in the face of humanity and peace.

Activism often comes from a place of love: one cannot hope for improvement without deep and shining optimism. Perhaps this care relates to Farghadani’s decision to remain in Iran. Concerning her practice, her art exists most poignantly within its initial state: in interaction with contemporary Iranian politics. Placing the work—and her physical self—outside of Iran’s political system impacts its significance, as well as her own identity. Art, as a mediation between the activist self and its author’s society, strikes several complex balances. This is not a new liminality to artist/activists, who straddle multiple boundaries simultaneously. Perhaps the most famous character of this specific duality is China’s Ai Weiwei, who has become somewhat of a posterboy of contemporary art as a reaction to the imposing Chinese government. 

The visual language of activism, understood as a reaction to injustice or violations to human rights, is powerful and constantly in flux. Its associated artworks thus shift dramatically regarding national context. In developing rigid, authoritarian governments, artists are first are foremost and heavily oppressed: art is an unknown fear that is emblematic of “free speech,” of anti-censorship. Art represents each power, voice and vehicle. This perhaps explains the shared persecution of Atena Farghadani and Ai Weiwei, who differ by their countries of origin and their respective attributes. There is a distinct and inadmissible difference regarding their international position in relation to the world, but also, in relation to us.

We read global art activism from a Western perspective, and specifically an American one: our enormous and diversely complicated nation often considers itself a form of mediation upon the entire world. This is not quite true, as mediation implies a certain equality and peace. America’s contemporary identity arises out of both idealized values and great oppression, and it is historically, socially and economically distinct. This being said, our country is in interaction—a past, present and future interaction—with every other nation in the world, and it maintains an immense amount of capital. An example of this took place last month when the United States Senate bi-partisanly and unanimously voted to ban the import of Syrian art objects and artifacts trafficked to likely finance terror groups. America’s global and economic power is enormous, and thus, we have an enormous responsibility to respect the national identities of both ourselves and others.

This can be done through the immeasurably powerful weapon of the arts, necessary now more than ever. Art is an imperative force in our changing world. In this column throughout the semester, I have sought to explore the intersections between art and society: particularly within the insular places of Bowdoin and America. I wanted to argue a fundamental importance of arts, but I found that arts courses are all important things by default. In some ways, I tried to prove something I already knew: human nature is contingent upon the arts, which remind us of the interconnectedness of all things.