Go to content, skip over navigation


More Pages

Go to content, skip over visible header bar
Home News Features Arts & Entertainment Sports OpinionAbout Contact Advertise

Note about Unsupported Devices:

You seem to be browsing on a screen size, browser, or device that this website cannot support. Some things might look and act a little weird.

Responding to ‘Texts’ exhibition

March 30, 2018

This piece represents the opinion of the author.

Editor’s note: this letter is in response to the recent exhibition “Texts,” held in the Blue Gallery from February 27 through Spring Break.

Thanks Steph and Lillian for thinking of this idea and to the women who submitted their texts. I left the exhibit confused about the range of texts that made it onto the wall. I’m sure that in the context of larger conversations or relationships these texts warranted the title of sexual harassment. However, reading through these, I saw texts ranging from repulsive solicitations to seemingly innocent invitations to drinks and finally a list of blurred out names alluding to the list of 33 sexual assailants at Middlebury that circulated last December. In including “the list,” which I read as a threat to publish something similar at Bowdoin, within the same 8×8 blue room as texts inviting someone out to drinks, I am concerned that sexual harassment, sexual assault and unwanted invitations were conflated. An exhibit that aims to examine sexual harassment in the digital age and includes references and allusions to sexual assault without greater explanation or attempt to explore the connection between these two terms is dangerous. Many viewers may have, as I did, walked into this exhibit lacking clarity in definitions and ways of thinking about harassment and assault. I worry that this exhibit further confused its audience.

Isabel Udell is a member of the Class of 2019. 



Before submitting a comment, please review our comment policy. Some key points from the policy:

  • No hate speech, profanity, disrespectful or threatening comments.
  • No personal attacks on reporters.
  • Comments must be under 200 words.
  • You are strongly encouraged to use a real name or identifier ("Class of '92").
  • Any comments made with an email address that does not belong to you will get removed.