NewsOpinionFeaturesArts & EntertainmentSportsThe Back PageArchives

 

 

 

 

 

 

Volume CXXXIII, Number 18
March 1, 2002
f

Penobscot leader speaks at Bowdoin
JULIANA GRINVALSKY
STAFF WRITER

Barry Dana, Chief of the Penobscot Nation, opened his Common Hour lecture on February 22 by asking his children what they would want him to tell the Bowdoin campus about their people. His younger son said that, although some of his teachers were hard, they had a good school. His daughter wanted to tell Bowdoin, "We are our own tribe."

Penobscot chief Barry Dana spoke about environmental issues at last Friday's Common Hour. (Henry Coppola, Bowdoin Orient)

In fact, that is perhaps one of the most integral ideas to the Penobscot culture that elder Dana conveyed in his talk. Even in council proceedings, all decisions are considered in terms of how they will affect the next seven generations of the tribe. Dana stressed how different this consideration was from the workings of modern federal and state government in the U.S., especially when dealing with regulation of the water quality of the rivers upon which the tribe relies for food, culture, and traditions.

While water regulations take into consideration basic water quality, they currently neglect the fact that the Penobscots use the rivers as a drinking water source, canoe and swim in their waters, and catch the fish that live there. Paper mills upstream release toxic organic chemicals such as dioxins that accumulate in the food chain and end up in the fish that the Penobscot people eat.

Dana and his people considered this environmental oversight to be as much of a disgracing as using an Indian chief as a mascot for a sports team. Perhaps even more so since poisoning of the rivers causes Dana's people to suffer from higher rates of death from cancer compared to populations outside the reservation. How has a small nation of about 500 people managed to maintain its sovereignty, and more importantly, protect the environment upon which its culture is connected under the pressure from the federal government?

This issue came to a head in the legal controversy in which the Penobscot tribe is presently embroiled. The Maine government has tried to subpoena the tribe to release documents concerning correspondence with EPA about controlling the water quality of the Penobscot and other rivers the tribe uses. Maine and 44 other states gained control of the permit process that allows discharge of chemicals by companies that was formerly regulated by the EPA. However, the EPA still remained in control of permits and water quality on tribal lands.

Since the Penobscot Nation considers itself an independent governing entity with its own say in the water quality issues of their rivers, the paper mills on the Penobscot River believed the tribe would set stricter regulations on pollution discharge. The tribe opposed the subpoena request because its government is independent; therefore, the court's order had no bearing in their affairs.

In the face of being held in contempt of court, the tribe agreed to remove its opposition to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), which the state uses to grant permits to the paper mills if the government would take tribal uses such as fishing and the gathering of wild plants into consideration when granting permits.

Dana's lecture was the opening event for the Symposium on Race, Justice, and the Environment held on Bowdoin's campus this past weekend. The Penobscot's battle highlights the troubles many Native American and other minority groups have faced when they have tried to address how environmental degradation has affected their people. In a culture where a person's identity, family, social structure, and culture all depend on the health of a river, the modern methods of environmental management may not be sufficient.